Is it true that most professional photographers consider the hasselblad with carl-zeiss lens the best camera? - carl zeiss lens
I think it has to speak of the training. Most professionals working in news, stocks, and some celebrity wedding photography, and in this case are the best digital SLR cameras like the Canon and Nikon. But if the studio photography and weddings, especially talk that I think is yes, the system Hasselblad Zeiss a special place for professionals. Things have changed in recent years, however, due to the transition to digital.
It does not use Zeiss lenses Hasselblad cameras, but that made by Fujinon. And wait.
Personally, I have a 503CW with Zeiss lenses and use the team is very, very nice, and of course very expensive. I expect to see digital back for these aircraft again dropped in price, and thousands if they do, may be sold, as many cameras in the series of 500 are.
Saturday, January 9, 2010
Carl Zeiss Lens Is It True That Most Professional Photographers Consider The Hasselblad With Carl-zeiss Lens The Best Camera?
8 comments:
It's like they think their digital Nikon or Canon is the best and nothing can surpass.
Bronica, which is almost a copy, is very good. Mamiya has several medium-format Mamiya cameras and lenses proved to be better than the Zeiss, Leica and Schneider. There are others who are myiad some examples of Russia and Zeiss Hassy cameras are.
I think Hasselblad is not as strong as the RB Mamiya RZ 67 makes and models. Basically, I believe, however, it is up to the ego and dollars in his pocket. Hassey are too expensive and built not in Sweden, I think Fuji is Hassy.
This is not the camera .......
The best answer is: "It depends". While the Hasselblad camera is probably the best in the world today are produced and Zeiss lenses are probably more than optical lenses today, if you need a small format camera, the Hasselblad is very problematic. Moreover, if what you need as a photographer, you would use a large format camera, the Hasselblad be possible, but not the bill completely.
In the area where it is a medium-format Hasselblad camera clearly the better camera quality. In Arean where you need a small camera attached, then you probably have a Canon or Nikon do not want. In the field of large-format Linhof or Toyo or Cambo are all good, but more important is the glasses.
What you think of Hasselblad marketing, or what? [It's like the third question you] up to date on him, yes, it's a great camera, but the people were big shots in front of a Hasselblad, and photograph the people very well now, no one. If you need a Hasselblad, and zero to one, I think it is not an average photographer who is already so good. I have very good in my Pontiac, but a Ferrari is faster. I Manage well.
Yes, because he gives much attention as
Yes
Yes, it is the general opinion.
But I think that camera phones going seconds. LOL.
In the area where they compete Hasselblad and markets its cameras, there are a lot of crap.
Frankly, people who can be a company to buy the medium-format cameras, the hand not afford to disappoint the camera.
Hasselblad offers by far the most expensive, but I think the Bronica is so good for a fraction of the price.
Post a Comment